CPU64 wrote:Hey, all I asked was a simple question, that a simple yes, or no would have answered. I honestly didn't want to write a "snide" remark but you thought it would be funny to twist my simple question around to trash me and my parts.
You Trolling into pass comment was not innocent but whatever. Knowing how you post in other people's threads like RJ's...your comment was far from innocent and was full of hidden meaning and the person that up voted it knew that as well..
If you honestly didn't want to write a snide remark then read what you write especially the quote below.
CPU64 wrote: Nice! yeah, there's plenty of excellent reference here to show all that needs to be fixed
That really sums you up to me. A very loaded comment attacking RJ's thrower and implying that It full of inaccuracies followed by a condescending smiley face.
CPU64 wrote:I was just playing along to see if you could take it as well as I can
You know what... I wasn't playing, your comment annoyed me, but nice to know you were. I changed your initial quote to a much nicer way of delivering your comment and "hoped" you would see the difference and was happy to let it go and move on, but it was water off a ducks back. You then fired away with a loaded remark attacking RJ's thrower and all the things I have to fix on it so I did the same to you and your parts... and it didn't seem to me that you "could take it as well as I can
"
CPU64 wrote:And yes, the thrower does look fantastic!
Thank you, that's very nice of you to say, even though the compliment has been forced to save face, I do however feel it's possibly the first time you have actually offered a compliment straight up. I'll let RJ know you like it.
The sad part is your thrower and parts are really top notch, it's your attitude that lets you down.
I also wouldn't be surprised to learn if the person up voting your comments was momeraths24 ...